What the AI Office expects beyond the text of the Act
The director of the European AI Office has described a supervisory practice that asks more of providers than the enforceable text alone requires.
Blog
Analysis and commentary on legal engineering, automation and the regulation of emerging technology.
The director of the European AI Office has described a supervisory practice that asks more of providers than the enforceable text alone requires.
The Third Circuit has affirmed that ROSS Intelligence infringed copyright by using 2,243 Westlaw headnotes to train its AI legal search engine, and that the use…
The AI Board met on 17 September 2026 and placed market surveillance, conformity assessment and the transparency duties in force since 2 August at the centre…
The EDPB adopted Guidelines 04/2026 on 17 September 2026. They set five steps for deciding whether a GDPR breach draws a fine, a reprimand or another…
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 inserted two prohibitions into Article 5 of the AI Act. They bind from 2 December 2026 and carry fines of up to 7…
The CNIL fined EXTIA 300,000 euros on 21 July 2026 after 12 erasure requests went unprocessed and 166 people were never told what had happened to…
The AI Office has sent its first requests for information to providers of general-purpose AI models, and a July implementing regulation sets out what the Commission…
From 11 September 2026 the EU Cyber Resilience Act obliges manufacturers to report actively exploited vulnerabilities within 24 hours, through a single ENISA platform.
SB 574 would add section 6068.1 to California's Business and Professions Code, forbidding an attorney to delegate the practice of law to generative AI and requiring…
Anthropic sets out how Claude’s text will be marked, the drafters answer the claim that watermarking degrades writing, and the Commission explains where AI agents already…